Published in

Brill Academic Publishers, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 1(28), p. 36-63, 2020

DOI: 10.1163/15718115-bja10003

Brill Academic Publishers, Nordic Journal of International Law, 1(89), p. 117-141, 2020

DOI: 10.1163/15718107-bja10003

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The Relationship between Third-party Countermeasures and the Security Council’s Chapter vii Powers: Enforcing Obligations erga omnes in International Law

Journal article published in 2020 by Amanda Bills, Mohit Gupta
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The Convention on Biological Diversity (cbd) was adopted in 1992. This Convention had three major objectives: conservation of biological diversity, sustainable use of its component, and access and benefit sharing of biological resources arising out of their utilisation. The Nagoya Protocol to the cbd was adopted in 2010 for the fulfilment of the third objective of the cbd, access and benefit sharing. Article 7 of the Nagoya Protocol imposes an obligation on states parties to ensure that “prior and informed consent or approval or involvement” of the indigenous and local communities is taken before their knowledge is accessed. The present study first analyses the contents of Article 7 of the Nagoya Protocol. It will throw light on the meaning of the phrase “prior and informed consent or approval and involvement” as used in Article 7. It then highlights the implementation of Article 7 by two states parties, namely, India and Bhutan.