Published in

American Academy of Neurology (AAN), Neurology, 2(93), p. 72-79, 2019

DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007747

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Subthreshold amyloid and its biological and clinical meaning

Journal article published in 2019 by Gérard N. Bischof ORCID, Heidi I. L. Jacobs ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The development of in vivo imaging of the pathologic hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD), β-amyloid (Aβ), altered the framing of its pathophysiology and formulation of inclusion criteria for clinical trials. Recent evidence suggests that in vivo measures of Aβ deposition below a threshold indicative of Aβ positivity carry critical information on future cognitive decline and accumulation of AD pathology, potentially already at a younger age. Here, we integrate the existing literature on histopathology of Aβ and its convergence and divergence with in vivo Aβ imaging. The evidence presented amounts to a reconceptualization, in which we advocate for a closer look into Aβ accumulation rates in earlier life, the factors that promote accumulation, comparative studies with different markers of Aβ, and longitudinal designs to elucidate when AD pathology rises and how it shifts from benign to malignant stages that ultimately define AD. These efforts open a new window of opportunity for disease-modifying interventions.