Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Canadian Science Publishing, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 12(95), p. 991-995

DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2017-0084

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Benefits and drawbacks of determining reproductive histories for black bears (Ursus americanus) from cementum annuli techniques

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Recruitment is difficult to estimate but is essential for determining population trend. Recruitment in bears can be estimated from patterns in width of cementum annuli that indicate years with cubs. We evaluated reproductive history estimates from cementum annuli of 19 101 black bears (Ursus americanus Pallas, 1780) collected over 20 years to determine the benefits and drawbacks of this technique for management agencies. The technique only worked to estimate reproductive histories for 25% of submitted samples, and 49% of samples with estimates contained uncertain litters. Whether uncertain litters were counted or not caused significant variation in estimates of age at first litter, number of litters per female, and interbirth intervals. Hence, naive treatment of uncertain litters may bias analyses. A data set we optimized to reduce bias showed that litters per female ranged from 0 to 12, mean interbirth interval was 2.07 years, and both increased as females aged. Large samples of teeth collected from harvested bears over multiple decades potentially provides a wealth of information on reproductive parameters at a minimal cost compared with intensive field studies, but until uncertain litters are understood mechanistically and can be better quantified, reproductive estimates from this technique should be interpreted with caution.