Published in

American Heart Association, Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 5(6), p. 692-699, 2013

DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.112.000627

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Age- and Sex-based Reference Limits and Clinical Correlates of Myocardial Strain and Synchrony: The Framingham Heart Study

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background— There is rapidly growing interest in applying measures of myocardial strain and synchrony in clinical investigations and in practice; data are limited regarding their reference ranges in healthy individuals. Methods and Results— We performed speckle-tracking–based echocardiographic measures of left ventricular myocardial strain and synchrony in healthy adults (n=739, mean age 63 years, 64% women) without cardiovascular disease. Reference values were estimated using quantile regression. Age- and sex-based upper (97.5th quantile) limits were: −14.4% to −17.1% (women) and −14.4 to −15.2% (men) for longitudinal strain; −22.3% to −24.7% (women) and −17.9% to −23.7% (men) for circumferential strain; 121 to 165 ms (women) and 143 to 230 ms (men) for longitudinal segmental synchrony (SD of regional time-to-peak strains); and 200 to 222 ms (women) and 216 to 303 ms (men) for transverse segmental synchrony. In multivariable analyses, women had ≈1.7% greater longitudinal strain, ≈2.2% greater transverse strain, and ≈3.2% greater circumferential strain ( P <0.0001 for all) compared with men. Older age and higher diastolic blood pressure, even within the normal range, were associated with worse transverse segmental synchrony ( P <0.001). Overall, covariates contributed to ≤12% of the variation in myocardial strain or synchrony in this healthy sample. Conclusions— We estimated age- and sex-specific reference limits for measures of left ventricular strain and synchrony in a healthy community-based sample, wherein clinical covariates contributed to only a modest proportion of the variation. These data may facilitate the interpretation of left ventricular strain-based measures obtained in future clinical research and practice.