Published in

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 4(19), p. 954-959, 2001

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.954

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Influences on Oncologists’ Adoption of New Agents in Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer

Journal article published in 2001 by Gina M. Buban, Brian K. Link ORCID, William R. Doucette
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

PURPOSE: Little is known about how oncologists’ adopt new treatments for breast cancer. This study investigated influences on oncologists’ adoption of paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, 9 months after presentation of phase III data suggesting improved disease-free and overall survival when paclitaxel was added to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for such patients. METHODS: Self-reported data were collected with a mail survey of a random sample of 1,200 oncologists practicing in the United States. Using Rogers’ model, we measured four types of influences on adoption of innovation: (1) communication channels, (2) innovation characteristics, (3) a practitioner’s social system, and (4) physician characteristics. Multiple regression analysis assessed the associations between oncologist adoption of paclitaxel for early-stage breast cancer patients and variables representing the modeled influences on adoption. RESULTS: On average, respondents (n = 181) reported having adopted paclitaxel for 37% of their early-stage breast cancer patients. The overall model was significant, with seven variables associated (P ≤ .05) with adoption of paclitaxel. Significant influences on adoption included use of symposia as a therapy information source, physician experience with paclitaxel to treat late-stage breast cancer, and perceived advantage in efficacy of paclitaxel. CONCLUSION: As new modalities become available to treat cancer, it is vital to understand what factors influence oncologists and patients when choosing to use them. Those parties interested in fostering the adoption of new breast cancer treatments should address features of communication channels (eg, use of symposia), characteristics of new treatments (eg, perceived advantage in efficacy), physicians’ social systems (eg, patient requests), and characteristics of potential adopters (eg, previous experience with the treatment).