Published in

Springer Nature [academic journals on nature.com], European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 4(71), p. 567-567, 2017

DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.17

Springer Nature [academic journals on nature.com], European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2(71), p. 274-283, 2016

DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.162

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Prostate cancer risk related to foods, food groups, macronutrients and micronutrients derived from the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium food diaries

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Other ; This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Nature Publishing Group via http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2016.162 ; Abstract ; $\small \textbf{BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES:}$ The influence of dietary factors remains controversial for screen-detected prostate cancer and inconclusive for clinically detected disease. We aimed to examine these associations using prospectively collected food diaries. $\small \textbf{SUBJECTS/METHODS:}$ A total of 1,717 prostate cancer cases in middle-aged and older UK men were pooled from four prospective cohorts with clinically detected disease ($n$ = 663), with routine data follow-up (means 6.6–13.3 years) and a case-control study with screen-detected disease ($n$ = 1054), nested in a randomised trial of prostate cancer treatments (ISCTRN 20141297). Multiple-day food diaries (records) completed by men prior to diagnosis were used to estimate intakes of 37 selected nutrients, food groups and items, including carbohydrate, fat, protein, dairy products, fish, meat, fruit and vegetables, energy, fibre, alcohol, lycopene and selenium. Cases were matched on age and diary date to at least one control within study ($n$ = 3528). Prostate cancer risk was calculated, using conditional logistic regression (adjusted for baseline covariates) and expressed as odds ratios in each quintile of intake (±95% confidence intervals). Prostate cancer risk was also investigated by localised or advanced stage and by cancer detection method. $\small \textbf{RESULTS:}$ There were no strong associations between prostate cancer risk and 37 dietary factors. $\small \textbf{CONCLUSIONS:}$ Prostate cancer risk, including by disease stage, was not strongly associated with dietary factors measured by food diaries in middle-aged and older UK men. ; Other ; Medical Research Council (Grant ID: MC_UU_12019/1), Medical Research Council Population Health Sciences Research Network, British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK (Grant ID: C8221/A19170), Department of Health, Food Standards Agency, Stroke Association, WCRF, National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme (Project IDs: 96/20/06, 96/20/99), National Cancer Research Institute (formed by Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council, Department of Health)