Published in

American Physiological Society, Journal of Applied Physiology, 1(103), p. 228-233

DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01334.2006

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

WISE 2005: stroke volume changes contribute to the pressor response during ischemic handgrip exercise in women

Journal article published in 2007 by J. K. Shoemaker, L. Mattar, P. Kerbeci, S. Trotter, P. Arbeille, R. L. Hughson ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The mechanism of the pressor response to small muscle mass (e.g., forearm) exercise and during metaboreflex activation may include elevations in cardiac output (Q̇) or total peripheral resistance (TPR). Increases in Q̇ must be supported by reductions in visceral venous volume to sustain venous return as heart rate (HR) increases. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that increases in Q̇, supported by reductions in splanchnic volume (portal vein constriction), explain the pressor response during handgrip exercise and metaboreflex activation. Seventeen healthy women performed 2 min of static ischemic handgrip exercise and 2 min of postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) while HR, stroke volume and superficial femoral artery flow (Doppler), blood pressure (Finometer), portal vein diameter (ultrasound imaging), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography) were measured followed by the calculation of Q̇, TPR, and leg vascular resistance (LVR). Compared with baseline, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) ( P < 0.001) and Q̇ ( P < 0.001) both increased in each minute of exercise accompanied by a ∼5% reduction in portal vein diameter ( P < 0.05). MAP remained elevated during PECO, whereas Q̇ decreased below exercise levels. MSNA was elevated above baseline during the second minute of exercise and through the PECO period ( P < 0.05). Neither TPR nor LVR was changed from baseline during exercise and PECO. The data indicate that the majority of the blood pressure response to isometric handgrip exercise in women was due to mobilization of central blood volume and elevated stroke volume and Q̇ rather than elevations in TVR or LVR resistance.