Published in

European Geosciences Union, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 12(7), p. 4455-4462, 2014

DOI: 10.5194/amt-7-4455-2014

European Geosciences Union, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, 8(7), p. 8125-8147

DOI: 10.5194/amtd-7-8125-2014

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Investigating uptake of N<sub>2</sub>O in agricultural soils using a high-precision dynamic chamber method

Journal article published in 2014 by N. J. Cowan, D. Famulari ORCID, P. E. Levy ORCID, M. Anderson, D. S. Reay, U. M. Skiba
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Uptake (or negative flux) of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) in agricultural soils is a controversial issue which has proven difficult to investigate in the past due to constraints such as instrumental precision and unknown methodological uncertainties. Using a recently developed high-precision quantum cascade laser (QCL) gas analyser combined with a closed dynamic chamber, a well defined detection limit of 4 μg N 2 O-N m −2 h −1 could be achieved for individual soil flux measurements. 1220 measurements of N 2 O flux were made from a variety of UK soils using this method, of which 115 indicated uptake by the soil (i.e. a negative flux in the micrometeorological sign convention). Only 4 of these apparently negative fluxes were greater than the detection limit of the method, which suggests that the vast majority of reported negative fluxes from such measurements are actually due to instrument noise. As such, we suggest that the bulk of negative N 2 O fluxes reported for agricultural fields are most likely due to limits in detection of a particular flux measurement methodology and not as a result of microbiological activity consuming atmospheric N 2 O.