Published in

Springer Verlag, AGE, 2(38)

DOI: 10.1007/s11357-016-9908-z

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Manual aiming in healthy aging: Does proprioceptive acuity make the difference?

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The present study examines whether non-active older adults are more dependent on visual information when executing aiming movements, and whether age-related declines in proprioception play a mediating role herein. Young (N=40) and older adults (N=38) were divided into physically active and non-active subgroups based on self-reported sports participation levels. In Experiment 1, participants executed wrist-aiming movements with and without visual feedback. In Experiment 2, passive proprioceptive acuity was assessed using wrist motion detection and position matching tests. Results showed similar aiming accuracy across age groups both with and without visual feedback, but older adults exhibited longer movement times, prolonged homing-in phase, and made more corrective submovements. Passive proprioceptive acuity was significantly affected by physical activity level and age, with participants in the active group scoring better than their non-active peers. However, these declines did not predict performance changes on the aiming task. Taken together, our observations suggest that decline in proprioceptive acuity did not predict performance changes on the aiming task and older adults were able to compensate for their decreased motion and position sense when allowed sufficient time. In line with these observations, we proposed that older adults are able to compensate for their decline in proprioception by increasing their reliance on predictive models.