Published in

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, RNA, 6(19), p. 733-734, 2013

DOI: 10.1261/rna.037895.112

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

miRNA-Seq normalization comparisons need improvement

Journal article published in 2013 by Alicia Oshlack, Xiaobei Zhou, Mark D. Robinson ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

As developers and users of informatics strategies, we are keenly interested in the relative merits of competing approaches. Crucially, there has been relatively little investigation into normalization strategies for miRNA-Seq data and the timely article from Garmire and Subramaniam promised to shed light on this issue. Unfortunately, errors in the implementation, poor choice of performance metrics (or poor choice of data set), few details about practical implementation (e.g., elimination of features containing zero count), and sensitivity to choices made regarding the reference truth data set have left many open questions about the best analysis methods for miRNA-Seq data. In this paper, we have discussed some of the subtle yet critical parameters that need to be carefully investigated. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.