Published in

American Geophysical Union, Geophysical Research Letters, 2(42), p. 323-330, 2015

DOI: 10.1002/2014gl062571

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

On the Validation of Seismic Imaging Methods: finite-frequency or ray theory?

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We investigate the merits of the more recently developed finite frequency approach to tomography against the more traditional and approximate ray theoretical approach for state of the art seismic models developed for western North America. To this end, we employ the spectral element method to assess the agreement between observations on real data and measurements made on synthetic seismograms predicted by the models under consideration. We check for phase delay agreement as well as waveform cross-correlation values. Based on statistical analyses on S-wave phase delay measurements, finite-frequency shows an improvement over ray theory. Random sampling using cross-correlation values identifies regions where synthetic seismograms computed with ray theory and finite frequency models differ the most. Our study suggests that finite frequency approaches to seismic imaging exhibit measurable improvement for pronounced low-velocity anomalies such as mantle plumes.