Published in

American Geophysical Union, Geophysical Research Letters, 14(38), p. n/a-n/a, 2011

DOI: 10.1029/2011gl048224

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of observed and simulated tropical climate trends using a forward model of coralδ18O: COMPARISON OF TROPICAL CLIMATE TRENDS

Journal article published in 2011 by D. M. Thompson, T. R. Ault, M. N. Evans, J. E. Cole, J. Emile-Geay ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The response of the tropical Pacific Ocean to future climate change remains highly uncertain, in part because of the disagreement among observations and coupled general circulation models (CGCMs) regarding 20th-century trends. Here we use forward models of climate proxies to compare CGCM simulations and proxy observations to address 20th-century trends and assess remaining uncertainties in both proxies and models. We model coral oxygen isotopic composition (delta18O) in a 23-site Indo-Pacific network as a linear function of sea-surface temperature (SST) and sea-surface salinity (SSS) obtained from historical marine observations (instrumental data) and a multimodel ensemble of 20th-century CGCM output. When driven with instrumental data from 1958 to 1990, the forward modeled corals (pseudocorals) capture the spatial pattern and temporal evolution of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Comparison of the linear trend observed in corals and instrumental pseudocorals suggests that the trend in corals between 1958 and 1990 results from both warming (60%) and freshening (40%). From 1890 to 1990, the warming/freshening trend in CGCM pseudocorals is weaker than that observed in corals. Corals display a moderate trend towards a reduced zonal SST gradient and decreased ENSO-related variance between 1895 and 1985, whereas CGCM pseudocorals display a range of trend patterns and an increase in ENSO-related variance over the same period. Differences between corals and CGCM pseudocorals may arise from uncertainties in the linear bivariate coral model, uncertainties in the way corals record climate, undersensitivity of CGCMs to radiative forcing during the 20th century, and/or biases in the simulated CGCM SSS fields.