Published in

Nature Research, Nature Methods, 6(6), p. 423-430, 2009

DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1333

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry–based proteomics

Journal article published in 2009 by Alexander W. Bell, Eric W. Deutsch ORCID, Catherine E. Au, Robert E. Kearney, Ron Beavis, Salvatore Sechi, Tommy Nilsson, John J. M. Bergeron, Thomas A. Beardslee, Thomas Chappell, Gavin Meredith, Peter Sheffield, Phillip Gray, Mahbod Hajivandi, Marshall Pope and other authors.
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We performed a test sample study to try to identify errors leading to irreproducibility, including incompleteness of peptide sampling, in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomics. We distributed an equimolar test sample, comprising 20 highly purified recombinant human proteins, to 27 laboratories. Each protein contained one or more unique tryptic peptides of 1,250 Da to test for ion selection and sampling in the mass spectrometer. Of the 27 labs, members of only 7 labs initially reported all 20 proteins correctly, and members of only 1 lab reported all tryptic peptides of 1,250 Da. Centralized analysis of the raw data, however, revealed that all 20 proteins and most of the 1,250 Da peptides had been detected in all 27 labs. Our centralized analysis determined missed identifications (false negatives), environmental contamination, database matching and curation of protein identifications as sources of problems. Improved search engines and databases are needed for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. ; 8 page(s)