Published in

Elsevier, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, (207), p. 107-116, 2015

DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.03.015

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Net ecosystem carbon dioxide exchange of dedicated bioenergy feedstocks: Switchgrass and high biomass sorghum

Journal article published in 2015 by Pradeep Wagle ORCID, Vijaya Gopal Kakani ORCID, Raymond L. Huhnke
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

As switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and high biomass sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) acreages are expanding for cellulosic biofuels, it is critical to improve understanding of carbon dynamics of these two potential bioenergy crops. Eddy flux measurements from co-located switchgrass and high biomass sorghum fields during the 2012 and 2013 growing seasons were analyzed to quantify and compare net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) between two species. Monthly ensemble averaged NEE reached seasonal peak values of −36.9 ± 1.78 and −35.9 ± 2.32 μmol m−2 s−1 in switchgrass and sorghum, respectively. Similar magnitudes of NEE (−10 to −11 g C m−2 d−1), gross primary production (GPP, 19–20 g C m−2 d−1) and ecosystem respiration (ER, 10–12 g C m−2 d−1) were observed in both ecosystems. Similarly, carbon fluxes of both ecosystems had similar response to air temperature and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Carbon fluxes exhibited an optimum temperature of slightly over 30 °C and decreased markedly beyond 35 °C. The NEE decreased markedly at higher VPD (>3 kPa) because of the stomatal closure control of photosynthesis. The switchgrass field was a larger carbon sink, with a cumulative seasonal carbon uptake of −406 ± 24 to −490 ± 59 g C m−2 compared to −261 ± 48 to −330 ± 45 g C m−2 by the sorghum field. The switchgrass stand was a net carbon sink for four to five months (April/May–August), while sorghum appeared to be a net carbon sink for only three months (June–August). Our results imply that the difference in carbon sink strength between the two species was driven mainly by the length of the growing season.