Published in

Elsevier, The Lancet Oncology, 7(11), p. 694-700, 2010

DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70041-3

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Potential pitfalls in the design and reporting of clinical trials

Journal article published in 2010 by Matthew R. Sydes ORCID, Ruth E. Langley
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials are the gold standard method for developing evidence-based medicine. Good trial design and an awareness of some potential pitfalls are likely to maximise the chances of a successful trial with a conclusion that adds meaningfully to the evidence base. This paper is aimed at people early in their research careers and focuses on some common, usually avoidable, pitfalls in trial design. The areas covered include: assessing the scientific idea; trial design; size and duration of the trial; analysis; and reporting and presentation.