Published in

Elsevier, Neuroscience Letters, 1(499), p. 57

DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.022

Elsevier, Neuroscience Letters, 2(496), p. 65-69

DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.075

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

No association between the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) val158met polymorphism and cognitive improvement following cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) in schizophrenia

Journal article published in 2011 by Kathryn Greenwood, Chi-Fa Hung, Maria Tropeano ORCID, Peter McGuffin, Til Wykes
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Cognitive deficits are rate limiters on recovery in schizophrenia that respond poorly to pharmacotherapy. Cognitive remediation therapy (CRT), a novel psychological therapy, has produced promising outcomes for cognition. However, little is known about the biological mechanisms that might underlie individual differences in CRT response. Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) is associated specifically with prefrontal cognition. The COMT Val158Met polymorphism is known to have a functional effect on the rate of dopamine degradation, which may be related to cognitive treatment response. This study aimed to determine whether COMT genotype influences cognitive improvement following CRT in schizophrenia. Participants with schizophrenia were recruited from three randomised controlled trials of CRT compared to treatment as usual, and one CRT treatment only trial, each providing 40 CRT sessions. Eighty-seven participants (40%) agreed to participate in the genetic study, and provided DNA for COMT genotyping. Cognitive function and psychopathology were assessed at baseline, post-treatment and 3-6-month follow-up. People with the COMT Val/Met genotype performed more poorly on categories achieved at baseline on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) than those homozygous for the Val or Met allele. Cognitive function improved with CRT but there was no association between this cognitive improvement and COMT genotype, either in the CRT group or in the total sample. The COMT val158Met polymorphism does not appear to be a clinically useful biomarker of cognitive improvement following CRT in schizophrenia. A complex set of factors may influence cognitive change, however, such that the COMT genotype might still have a subtle effect on response to CRT or similar interventions.