Published in

Nature Research, Nature Genetics, 3(47), p. 291-295, 2015

DOI: 10.1038/ng.3211

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

LD Score Regression Distinguishes Confounding from Polygenicity in Genome-Wide Association Studies

Journal article published in 2015 by A. Corvin, C. C. Zai ORCID, X. Zheng, F. Zimprich, J. T. R. Walters, K.-H. Farh, P. A. Holmans, P. Lee, D. A. Collier, H. Huang, T. H. Pers, I. Agartz, E. Agerbo, M. Albus, M. Alexander and other authors.
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Both polygenicity (many small genetic effects) and confounding biases, such as cryptic relatedness and population stratification, can yield an inflated distribution of test statistics in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, current methods cannot distinguish between inflation from a true polygenic signal and bias. We have developed an approach, LD Score regression, that quantifies the contribution of each by examining the relationship between test statistics and linkage disequilibrium (LD). The LD Score regression intercept can be used to estimate a more powerful and accurate correction factor than genomic control. We find strong evidence that polygenicity accounts for the majority of the inflation in test statistics in many GWAS of large sample size.