Published in

American Geophysical Union, Water Resources Research, 3(51), p. 1758-1774, 2015

DOI: 10.1002/2014wr015543

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Transient response ofSalixcuttings to changing water level regimes

Journal article published in 2015 by L. Gorla, C. Signarbieux ORCID, P. Turberg, A. Buttler, P. Perona ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Sustainable water management requires an understanding of the effects of flow regulation on riparian eco-morphological processes. We investigated the transient response of Salix viminalis by examining the effect of water level regimes on its above and below-ground biomass. Four sets of Salix cuttings, three juveniles (in the first growing season) and one mature (one year old), were planted and initially grown under the same water-level regime for one month. We imposed three different water level regime treatments representing natural variability, a seasonal trend with no peaks, and minimal flow (characteristic of hydropower) consisting of a constant water level and natural flood peaks. We measured sap flux, stem water potential, photosynthesis, growth parameters, and final root architecture. The mature cuttings were not affected by water table dynamics, but the juveniles displayed causal relationships between the changing water regime, plant growth, and root distribution during a two-month transient period. For example, a 50% drop in mean sap flux corresponded with a −1.5 Mpa decrease in leaf water potential during the first day after the water regime was changed. In agreement with published field observations, the cuttings concentrated their roots close to the mean water table of the corresponding treatment, allowing survival under altered conditions and resilience to successive stress events. Juvenile development was strongly impacted by the minimum flow regime, leading to more than 60% reduction of both above- and below-ground biomass, with respect to the other treatments. Hence, we suggest avoiding minimum flow regimes where Salix restoration is prioritized. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.