Published in

American Geophysical Union, Journal of Geophysical Research, C6(102), p. 12367-12388, 1997

DOI: 10.1029/97jc00470

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Ocean carbon transport in a box-diffusion versus a general circulation model

Journal article published in 1997 by Fortunat Joos ORCID, James C. Orr ORCID, Ulrich Siegenthaler
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We have compared vertical transport of temperature, anthropogenic CO 2, natural radiocarbon ( 14C), and bomb 14C in a global box-diffusion model (B-D) and a three-dimensional (3-D) ocean general circulation model. We have calculated apparent diffusivities (K ap) vertically over the global ocean that range mostly between 4000 and 8000 m 2 yr -1. These K ap agree quantitatively with diffusivities found by fitting B-D models to observed distributions of natural and bomb 14C. We then used these sets of K ap in different runs of a global B-D model. The best agreement (within 3%) between 3-D CO 2 simulations and B-D model runs was found when applying K ap derived from bomb 14C in the surface and from natural 14C in the deep. We have found it appropriate to study global oceanic uptake of anthropogenic CO 2 with B-D model and to validate anthropogenic carbon uptake models using natural and bomb 14C observations. 14C seems less than ideal to validate the convective scheme of general circulation models.