Published in

Oxford University Press, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 6(87), p. 1678-1685, 2008

DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/87.6.1678

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of different nutritional assessments and body-composition measurements in detecting malnutrition among gynecologic cancer patients

Journal article published in 2008 by Brenda Laky, Monika Janda ORCID, Geoffrey J. Cleghorn, Andreas Obermair ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: Few studies have assessed global nutritional assessment tools and body-composition measurements in gynecologic cancer patients. Objective: We aimed to assess the convergent validity of different nutritional tools such as the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), serum albumin, skinfold-thickness measurements, and total-body potassium (TBK) and body density measurements to identify gynecologic cancer patients at risk of malnutrition. Design: We assessed the nutritional status of 194 patients with suspected or proven gynecologic cancer according to the SGA and the scored PG-SGA, and skinfold-thickness (n = 145), TBK (n = 51), and body density measurements (n = 42) before primary treatment. Results: According to the SGA and the scored PG-SGA global rating, 24% of gynecologic cancer patients were classified as malnourished. The prevalence of malnutrition was highest in ovarian (67%) and lowest in endometrial (6%) cancer patients. The ability of the PG-SGA score (P