Published in

American Geophysical Union, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 3(129), 2024

DOI: 10.1029/2023jd039818

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A CloudSat and CALIPSO‐Based Evaluation of the Effects of Thermodynamic Instability and Aerosol Loading on Amazon Basin Deep Convection and Lightning

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractThe Amazon Basin, which plays a critical role in the carbon and water cycle, is under stress due to changes in climate, agricultural practices, and deforestation. The effects of thermodynamic and microphysical forcing on the strength of thunderstorms in the Basin (75–45°W, 0–15°S) were examined during the pre‐monsoon season (mid‐August through mid‐December), a period with large variations in aerosols, intense convective storms, and plentiful flashes. The analysis used measurements of radar reflectivity, ice water content (IWC), and aerosol type from instruments aboard the CloudSat and CALIPSO satellites, flash rates from the ground‐based Sferics Timing and Ranging Network, and total aerosol optical depth (AOD) from a surface network and a meteorological re‐analysis. After controlling for convective available potential energy (CAPE), it was found that thunderstorms that developed under dirty (high‐AOD) conditions were 1.5 km deeper, had 50% more IWC, and more than two times as many flashes as storms that developed under clean conditions. The sensitivity of flashes to AOD was largest for low values of CAPE where increases of more than a factor of three were observed. The additional ice water indicated that these deeper systems had higher vertical velocities and more condensation nuclei capable of sustaining higher concentrations of water and large hydrometeors in the upper troposphere. Flash rates were also found to be larger during periods when smoke rather than dust was common in the lower troposphere, likely because smoky periods were less stable due to higher values of CAPE and AOD and lower values of mid‐tropospheric relative humidity.