Published in

IOP Publishing, Physiological Measurement, 9(44), p. 094001, 2023

DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/acf992

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Characterization of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular controls via spectral causality analysis in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement during a three-month follow-up

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Objective. Aortic valve stenosis (AVS) induces left ventricular function adaptations and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) restores blood flow profile across aortic valve. Modifications of cardiac hemodynamics induced by AVS and SAVR might alter cardiovascular (CV) and cerebrovascular (CBV) controls. The study aims at characterizing CV and CBV regulations one day before SAVR (PRE), within one week after SAVR (POST), and after a three-month follow-up (POST3) in 73 AVS patients (age: 63.9 ± 12.9 yrs; 48 males, 25 females) from spontaneous fluctuations of heart period (HP), systolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure and mean cerebral blood velocity. Approach. CV and CBV regulations were typified via a bivariate autoregressive approach computing traditional frequency domain markers and causal squared coherence (CK 2) from CV and CBV variabilities. Univariate time and frequency domain indexes were calculated as well. Analyses were carried out in frequency bands typical of CV and CBV controls at supine rest and during active standing. A surrogate method was exploited to check uncoupling condition. Main results. We found that: (i) CV regulation is impaired in AVS patients; (ii) CV regulation worsens in POST; (iii) CV regulation recovers in POST3 and CV response to active standing is even better than in PRE; (iv) CBV regulation is preserved in AVS patients; (v) SAVR does not affect CBV control; (vi) parameters of the CBV control in POST3 and PRE are similar. Significance. CK 2 is particularly useful to characterize CV and CBV controls in AVS patients and to monitor of patient’s evolution after SAVR.