Published in

Oxford University Press, Rheumatology, 8(61), p. 3396-3400, 2021

DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab875

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Evaluation of SIGLEC1 in the diagnosis of suspected systemic lupus erythematosus

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of SIGLEC1, a surrogate marker of type I IFN, with established biomarkers in an inception cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods SIGLEC1 was analysed by flow cytometry in 232 patients referred to our institution with suspected SLE between October 2015 and September 2020. Results SLE was confirmed in 76 of 232 patients (32.8 %) according to the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria and their SIGLEC1 values were significantly higher compared with patients without SLE (P <0.0001). A sensitivity of 98.7 %, a specificity of 82.1 %, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.2 % and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.8 % were calculated for SIGLEC1. Adjusted to the highest reported prevalence of SLE, the NPV and PPV were >99.9 % and 0.1 %, respectively. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and DeLong testing, the area under the curve (AUC) for SIGLEC1 (AUC = 0.95) was significantly higher than for ANA (AUC = 0.88, P = 0.031), C3 (AUC = 0.83, P = 0.001) and C4 (AUC = 0.83, P = 0.002) but not for anti-dsDNA antibodies (AUC = 0.90, P = 0.163). Conclusion IFN-I pathway activation is detectable in almost all newly diagnosed SLE patients. Thus, a negative test result for SIGLEC1 is powerful to exclude SLE in suspected cases.