Published in

European Geosciences Union, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(9), p. 5027-5042, 2009

DOI: 10.5194/acp-9-5027-2009

European Geosciences Union, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 2(9), p. 7927-7969

DOI: 10.5194/acpd-9-7927-2009

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The influence of foreign vs. North American emissions on surface ozone in the US

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

As part of the Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution (HTAP; http:// www.htap.org ) project, we analyze results from 15 global and 1 hemispheric chemical transport models and compare these to Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNet) observations in the United States (US) for 2001. Using the policy-relevant maximum daily 8-h average ozone (MDA8 O 3 ) statistic, the multi-model ensemble represents the observations well (mean r 2 =0.57, ensemble bias = +4.1 ppbv for all US regions and all seasons) despite a wide range in the individual model results. Correlations are strongest in the northeastern US during spring and fall ( r 2 =0.68); and weakest in the midwestern US in summer ( r 2 =0.46). However, large positive mean biases exist during summer for all eastern US regions, ranging from 10–20 ppbv, and a smaller negative bias is present in the western US during spring (~3 ppbv). In nearly all other regions and seasons, the biases of the model ensemble simulations are ≤5 ppbv. Sensitivity simulations in which anthropogenic O 3 -precursor emissions (NO x + NMVOC + CO + aerosols) were decreased by 20% in four source regions: East Asia (EA), South Asia (SA), Europe (EU) and North America (NA) show that the greatest response of MDA8 O 3 to the summed foreign emissions reductions occurs during spring in the West (0.9 ppbv reduction due to 20% emissions reductions from EA + SA + EU). East Asia is the largest contributor to MDA8 O 3 at all ranges of the O 3 distribution for most regions (typically ~0.45 ppbv) followed closely by Europe. The exception is in the northeastern US where emissions reductions in EU had a slightly greater influence than EA emissions, particularly in the middle of the MDA8 O 3 distribution (response of ~0.35 ppbv between 35–55 ppbv). EA and EU influences are both far greater (about 4x) than that from SA in all regions and seasons. In all regions and seasons O 3 -precursor emissions reductions of 20% in the NA source region decrease MDA8 O 3 the most – by a factor of 2 to nearly 10 relative to foreign emissions reductions. The O 3 response to anthropogenic NA emissions is greatest in the eastern US during summer at the high end of the O 3 distribution (5–6 ppbv for 20% reductions). While the impact of foreign emissions on surface O 3 in the US is not negligible – and is of increasing concern given the recent growth in Asian emissions – domestic emissions reductions remain a far more effective means of decreasing MDA8 O 3 values, particularly those above 75 ppb (the current US standard).