Published in

BioMed Central, Cancer Cell International, 1(21), 2021

DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-02258-3

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Identification of novel key genes associated with the metastasis of prostate cancer based on bioinformatics prediction and validation

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background Metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is a lethal tumor. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying PCa progression have not been fully elucidated. Methods Transcriptome expression profiling and clinical information on primary and metastatic PCa samples were obtained from TCGA. R software was used to screen the DEGs, and LASSO logistical regression method was utilized to identify the pivotal PCa metastasis-related DEGs. The transcriptional expression levels of the key genes were analyzed using the UALCAN database, and the corresponding protein expression were validated by Immunohistochemistry (IHC). Survival analysis of the key genes was performed using the GEPIA database. Wound healing assay and Transwell assay were conducted to determine whether knockdown of the key genes influence the migration and invasion abilities of PCa cells (22Rv1 and PC3). GSEA was performed to predict key genes-mediated signaling pathways for the development of PCa. Western blotting was used to evaluate the expression changes of E-cadherin, Twist1, and Vimentin in PCa cells with the key genes silencing. An in vivo mouse metastatic model for PCa was also generated to verify the important role of ISG15 and CST2 in PCa metastasis. Results A comparison between primary and metastatic PCa tissues was conducted, and 19 DEGs were screened. Among these, three key genes were identified that might be closely associated with PCa progression according to the LASSO logistical analysis, namely ISG15, DNAH8, and CST2. Further functional experiments revealed that knockdown of ISG15 and CST2 suppressed wound healing, migration, and invasion of PCa cells. To explore the molecular mechanism of ISG15 and CST2 in the development of PCa, GSEA was performed, and it was found that both genes play crucial roles in cell adhesion molecules, extracellular matrix-receptor interaction, and focal adhesion. Western blotting results exhibited that inhibiting ISG15 and CST2 led to increase the expression of E-cadherin and decrease the expression of Twist1 and Vimentin. Additionally, the metastatic in vivo study demonstrated that both PC3 and 22Rv1 cells expressing with luciferase-shISG15 and luciferase-shCST2 had significantly lower detectable bioluminescence than that in the control PCa cells. Conclusion ISG15 and CST2 may participate in PCa metastasis by regulating the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) signaling pathway. These findings may help to better understand the pathogenetic mechanisms governing PCa and provide promising therapeutic targets for metastatic PCa therapy.