Published in

Oxford University Press, The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 8(78), p. 1392-1401, 2023

DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glad037

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Dual Roles of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Fatigability in the Life-Space Mobility of Older Adults: The Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA)

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background Cardiorespiratory fitness and perceived fatigability are interrelated components of physical capacity that may jointly influence movement within one’s living environment (life-space mobility). We examined whether fitness and fatigability were associated with life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults, and whether the association of fitness with life-space varied by the level of perceived fatigability. Methods Participants were from the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA) baseline cohort (N = 775, mean age 76.1 years). Life Space Assessment scores incorporated level, frequency, and assistance used (personal, devices) for life-space mobility. Fitness was measured as VO2peak from symptom-limited treadmill testing. Fatigability cut-points included: (i) Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) ≥ 10 after a fixed-speed (1.5 mph) treadmill test, (ii) the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) Physical ≥ 15, and (iii) PFS Mental ≥ 13. The total count of cut-points was used as a composite fatigability measure (range: 0–3). Linear regressions were adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and health confounders. Results Better fitness was associated with greater life-space, but the association plateaued at higher fitness levels (VO2peak > 18). Life-space was significantly lower for individuals meeting ≥2 fatigability criteria (vs none), attributable mainly to more severe physical, but not mental, fatigability. In moderation analyses, the fitness–life-space association was significant only for those with RPE ≥ 10 but did not differ by PFS. Conclusion Fitness below a critically low threshold was associated with limited life-space mobility, suggesting that certain older individuals may need to operate close to their maximum aerobic capacity to traverse daily environments; these associations were driven by those with more severe physical fatigability.