Published in

Oxford University Press, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1(519), p. 1562-1577, 2022

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac3404

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A systematic validation of hot Neptunes in TESS data

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ABSTRACT We statistically validated a sample of hot Neptune candidates applying a two-step vetting technique using dave and triceratops. We performed a systematic validation of 250 transit-like events in the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite archive in the parameter region defined by $P\le 4\, \text{d}$ and $3\, {\rm R}_{⊕ }\le R \le 5\, {\rm R}_{⊕ }$. Through our analysis, we identified 18 hot Neptune-sized candidates, with a false positive probability ${\lt}50{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$. Nine of these planet candidates still need to be confirmed. For each of the nine targets, we retrieved the stellar parameters using ARIADNE and derived constraints on the planetary parameters by fitting the light curves with the juliet package. Within this sample of nine candidates, we statistically validated (i.e. with false positive probability ${\lt}0.3{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$) two systems (TOI-277 b and TOI-1288 b) by re-processing the candidates with triceratops along with follow-up observations. These new validated exoplanets expand the known hot Neptunes population and are high-priority targets for future radial velocities follow-up.