Published in

Wiley, Liver International, 10(42), p. 2247-2259, 2022

DOI: 10.1111/liv.15337

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Final safety and efficacy results from a 106 real‐world patients registry with an ascites‐mobilizing pump

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractBackground and aimsPatients with cirrhotic refractory ascites ineligible for transjugular intrahepatic shunt (TIPSS) have limited treatment options apart from repeated large volume paracentesis. The alfapump® is an implantable device mobilizing ascites from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder, from where it can be excreted. The aim of this observational cohort study was to prospectively investigate safety and efficacy of the device in a real‐world cohort with cirrhotic refractory ascites and contraindications for TIPSS.MethodsA total of 106 patients received an implant at 12 European centres and were followed up for up to 24 months. Complications, device deficiencies, frequency of paracentesis, clinical status and survival were recorded prospectively.ResultsApproximately half of the patients died on‐study, about a quarter was withdrawn because of serious adverse events leading to explant, a sixth were withdrawn because of liver transplant or recovery, and nine completed follow‐up. The most frequent causes of on‐study death and complication‐related explant were progression of liver disease and infection. The device reduced the requirement for large‐volume paracentesis significantly, with more than half of patients not having required any post‐implant. Survival benefits were not observed. Device‐related reinterventions were predominantly caused by device deficiencies. A post‐hoc comparison of the first 50 versus the last 50 patients enrolled revealed a decreased reintervention rate in the latter, mainly related to peritoneal catheter modifications.ConclusionsThe device reduced paracentesis frequency in a real‐world setting. Technical complications were successfully decreased by optimization of management and device modification (NCT01532427).