Published in

American Heart Association, Circulation: Heart Failure, 9(15), 2022

DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.122.009669

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure According to Sex: Extended Follow-Up Study of the DANISH Trial

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: Men and women may respond differently to certain therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, including implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). In an extended follow-up study of the DANISH trial (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients With Non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality), adding 4 years of additional follow-up, we examined the effect of ICD implantation according to sex. Methods: In the DANISH trial, 1116 patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure were randomized to receive an ICD (N=556) or usual clinical care (N=550). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Results: Of the 1116 patients randomized in the DANISH trial, 307 (27.5%) were women. During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, women had a lower associated rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.47–0.78]) cardiovascular death (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.46–0.84]), nonsudden cardiovascular death (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.42–0.85]), and a numerically lower rate of sudden cardiovascular death (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.40–1.25]), compared with men. Compared with usual clinical care, ICD implantation did not reduce the rate of all-cause mortality, irrespective of sex (men, HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.69–1.06]; women, HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.64–1.50]; P interaction=0.51). In addition, sex did not modify the effect of ICD implantation on sudden cardiovascular death (men, HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.36–0.92]; women, HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.26–1.77]; P interaction=0.76). Conclusions: In patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure, ICD implantation did not provide an overall survival benefit, but reduced sudden cardiovascular death, irrespective of sex. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT00542945.