Published in

American Association for Cancer Research, Clinical Cancer Research, 2023

DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-2326

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of circulating tumor DNA assays for Molecular Residual Disease detection in early-stage triple negative breast cancer

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients who have completed treatment for early-stage breast cancer is associated with a high risk of relapse, yet the optimal assay for ctDNA detection is unknown. Experimental design: The cTRAK-TN clinical trial prospectively used tumor informed digital PCR (dPCR) assays for ctDNA molecular residual disease (MRD) detection in early-stage triple negative breast cancer. We compared tumor informed dPCR assays with tumor informed personalized multi-mutation sequencing assays in 141 patients from cTRAK-TN. Results: MRD was first detected by personalized sequencing in 47.9% of patients, 0% first detected by dPCR, and 52.1% with both assays simultaneously (p<0.001, Fisher’s exact test). The median lead time from ctDNA detection to relapse was 6.1 months with personalized sequencing and 3.9 months with dPCR (p=0.004, mixed effects Cox model). Detection of MRD at the first timepoint was associated with a shorter time to relapse compared with detection at subsequent timepoints (median lead time 4.2 vs 7.1 months, p=0.02). Conclusions: Personalized multi-mutation sequencing assays have potential clinically important improvements in clinical outcome in the early detection of MRD.