Published in

SAGE Publications, European Stroke Journal, 4(7), p. 413-420, 2022

DOI: 10.1177/23969873221120159

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Frequency, associated variables, and outcomes of acute myocardial injury according to the fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction in patients with acute ischemic stroke

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: Myocardial injury as indicated by elevation of cardiac troponin levels is common after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and linked to poor outcomes. Previous studies rarely reported on serial hs-cTn measurements to distinguish whether myocardial injury is acute or chronic. Thus, little is known about frequency, associated variables, and outcome of acute myocardial injury in AIS. Methods and patients: In this single-centered observational cohort study, from 01/2019 to 12/2020, consecutive patients with neuroimaging-confirmed AIS <48 h after symptom onset, and serial troponin measurements within the first 2 days after admission (Roche Elecsys®, hs-cardiac troponin T) were prospectively registered. Acute myocardial injury was defined according to the fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (troponin above the upper reference limit and rise/fall>20%). Outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and unfavorable functional status at discharge (modified Rankin Scale >1). Results: Out of 1067 analyzed patients, 25.3% had acute myocardial injury, 40.4% had chronic myocardial injury and 34.3% had no myocardial injury. Older age, higher stroke severity, thrombolytic treatment, and impaired kidney function were independently associated with acute myocardial injury. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with acute myocardial injury than in those without (13% vs 3%, adjusted OR, 2.9% [95% CI, 1.6–5.5]). Compared with no myocardial injury, both acute and chronic myocardial injury were associated with unfavorable functional status at discharge (adjusted OR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1–2.5] and OR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.2–2.4], respectively). Conclusions: A quarter of patients with AIS have evidence of acute myocardial injury according to the fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. The strong association with in-hospital mortality highlights the need for clinical awareness and future studies on underlying mechanisms.