Published in

Elsevier, Remote Sensing of Environment, (154), p. 8-18, 2014

DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.08.007

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Large-scale retrieval of leaf area index and vertical foliage profile from the spaceborne waveform lidar (GLAS/ICESat)

Journal article published in 2014 by Hao Tang, Ralph Dubayah, Matthew Brolly ORCID, Sangram Ganguly, Gong Zhang
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Leaf area index (LAI) and canopy vertical profiles are important descriptors of ecosystem structure. The Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) on board ICESat (Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite) provided three-dimensional observations that can be used to derive these canopy structure parameters globally. While several canopy height products have been produced globally from GLAS, no comparable data sets for LAI and canopy profiles exist across large areas. In this study we develop a physically based method of retrieving LAI and vertical foliage profiles (VFPs) from GLAS observations over the entire state of California, USA. This method refines lidar derived LAI and VFP through a recursive analysis of GLAS waveforms using ancillary data obtained from existing remote sensing products. Those supplemental inputs include canopy clumping index derived from POLDER, 500 m land cover type and 1 km LAI data derived from MODIS. Implementation of our method created state-level LAI and VFP data for the existing GLAS transects over California. We then analyzed the variability of LAI and VFP data sets across environmental gradients and as a function of land cover type and elevation. Both LAI and VFP showed strong variability across elevational gradients and among land cover types. We compared our results at the scale of GLAS footprints with an LAI map derived from Landsat (at 30 m) and found moderate agreement (r2 = 0.34, bias = 0.26, RMSD (Root Mean Square Difference) = 1.85) between the two. In particular, Landsat LAI not only appeared to saturate relative to GLAS LAI at around LAI = 5, but also showed an overestimation for LAI less than about 2. Best agreement between the two LAI data sets was shown to occur in areas with slope less than 20°. Results from our study suggest the possibility of retrieving global LAI and VFP data from GLAS data and the potential for synergetic observation of lidar and passive optical remote sensing data such as Landsat.