Published in

Wiley, European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 20(2005), p. 4193-4205, 2005

DOI: 10.1002/ejic.200500470

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

B-substituted (arene)ruthenacarborane-sulfonium, -thioether and -mercaptan complexes: mild single and double dealkylation and structural implications in the antipodal distance

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Reactions of [RuCl2(eta(6)-arene)(2) (arene = benzene, p-cymene) with nido-[7-R-10-L-7,8-C2B9H9](-) in THF at room temperature for 3 d give the (arene)ruthenacarborane complexes closo-[3-Ru(eta(6)-arene)-l-R-8-L-l,2-C2B9H9](-) {arene = benzene, R = H [L = Me2S (1a), THT (1b), EtPhS (1c)], R = Me [L = Me2S (2a)]; arene = p-cymene, R = H [L = Me2S (3a)]} and mercaptan closo-[3-Ru(n(6)-arene)-1-R-8-HS-1,2-C2B9H9] [arene = benzene, R = H (4), Me (5); arene = p-cymene, R = H (6)] in yields of 20-40% and 22-29%, respectively. The asymmetric ligand nido-[9-Me2S-7,8-C2B9H10](-) leads to the thioether complex closo-[3-Ru(q 6 -benzene) -7-MeS- 1,2C(2)B(9)H(10)] (8) in 34 % yield under the same reaction conditions. The crystal structure of la is described and compared with those of 4 and 8. The fully assigned B-11 NMR spectroscopic data for a whole series of ruthenacarboranes having B-substituted sulfonium, thioether and mercaptan groups are presented. These data show a relation between antipodal cluster atom distances (antipodal distance) and antipodal effect (AE) in the crystal structures of these complexes and for other families of heteroboranes such as closo-[EB11H11] and closo-[EB9H9].