Published in

Wiley, Pediatric Transplantation, 5(22), p. e13226

DOI: 10.1111/petr.13226

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Non-invasive staging of chronic kidney allograft damage using urine metabolomic profiling

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractChronic kidney allograft damage is characterized by IFTA and GS. We sought to identify urinary metabolite signatures associated with severity of IFTA and GS in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Urine samples (n = 396) from 60 pediatric transplant recipients were obtained at the time of kidney biopsy and assayed for 133 metabolites by mass spectrometry. Metabolite profiles were quantified via PLS‐DA. We used mixed‐effects regression to identify laboratory and clinical predictors of histopathology. Urine samples (n = 174) without rejection or AKI were divided into training/validation sets (75:25%). Metabolite classifiers trained on IFTA severity and %GS showed strong statistical correlation (r = .73, P < .001 and r = .72; P < .001, respectively) and remained significant on the validation sets. Regression analysis identified additional clinical features that improved prediction: months post‐transplant (GS, IFTA); and proteinuria, GFR, and age (GS only). Addition of clinical variables improved performance of the %GS classifier (AUC = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.85‐0.96) but not for IFTA (AUC = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.71‐0.92). Despite the presence of potentially confounding phenotypes, these findings were further validated in samples withheld for rejection or AKI. We identify urine metabolite classifiers for IFTA and GS, which may prove useful for non‐invasive assessment of histopathological damage.